-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 710
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
API Review #64
Comments
I also have some comments about API changes #249, maybe we can discuss this topic together :) |
I think the type name And I agree with @ScorpioCPH about the status:
For example, I think |
I suggest we should use
|
I agree we should probably get rid of "master". I actually think we should probably get rid of ReplicaType and introduce properties that control different behaviors of the replica such as termination policy. Users can then assign an arbitrary name to each replica. |
+1, @jlewi we can use a property named
|
It seems like we must use something to specify the I don't think |
Closing this issue since the proposal for the v1alpha2 API has been approved. |
Opening an issue to track API issues that should be addressed as part of moving from Alpha to Beta.
TfReplicaType
- Should this be an enum?
- Instead of specifying replica type should we specify features e.g. run forever, restart always, etc...
master vs. chief nomenclature
@mrry from tensorflow should be included on the eventual api review.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: