Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSD #6

Open
emika143 opened this issue Nov 30, 2011 · 2 comments
Open

MSD #6

emika143 opened this issue Nov 30, 2011 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@emika143
Copy link
Collaborator

MSD, seems to be periodic without any notable slope until very high temperatures, for example Silver gets a linear MSD at approx. 12400K, the expected way (I think) would be a small slop in the solid state, bigger slope in the liquid state and even bigger slope in the gas state. (Maybe we can't see any difference between liquid and gas due to the chosen potential)...

@ghost ghost assigned emika143 Nov 30, 2011
@krikru
Copy link
Owner

krikru commented Nov 30, 2011

We need to check all constants (they're located in definitions.h) and in parameters again, maybe some of them are wrong. We should also pick the lattice constant from a table instead of calculating it from sigma, although this is probably not what causes the problem (the current formula for the lattice constant is very simple and only takes the nearest neighbors into account and should hence give a lattice constant that is slightly too large).

If that doesn't work, maybe the forces or the temperature is calculated incorrectly. We have to check everything that may affect the behavior of the simulation. This problem is an indication that the simulation isn't going alright.

Another issue that Emil detected, that may be related but is probably not, was in the energy plots in a long simulation. While the temperature and the potential energy stayed pretty constant, the total energy increased over time. The most probable is that one of these three parameters are calculated incorrectly or that one of them is written to the wrong file. It could also be that the total energy is so close to zero that the deviations that exist get magnified very much, but this is not so likely.

@krikru
Copy link
Owner

krikru commented Nov 30, 2011

Another thing I came to think of is that a lot of the initial kinetic energy the system has is required to break the bonds that exist between the atoms when the element is being melt. That is the reason why the temperature drops so much in the beginning of the simulation, but as Emil said, it only drops to like half the temperature or something like that, so it should still be above the melting point. We always have to consider that the temperature will drop considerably from the initial temperature in the start of the simulation, though.

@ghost ghost assigned krikru and emika143 Dec 1, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants