Manual and rushed study review process

[pieterlukasse]

We need well-defined reviewers for studies and timely reviews. currently "qualified" reviewers are people that are at 200% capacity and urgency usually comes if Adam gets antsy or if some big conference is on the horizon, then it's a panicked rush.

Priority:

Desired solution:

Preferred or recommended technical approach:

DoD:

Ideas

• One idea would be to have some automated QC checks to run when a study is loaded. Checks could include some automated verifications like:
  • Do we have the expected number of samples?
  • Do we see expected key genes in the list of most mutated genes?
  • Do we see overall correlation between RNA expression and CNA data?
  • Do we have oncokb annotations?
• Manual QC checks could be supported by a dedicated QC tab in Study View page, specifically designed to:
  • show useful summary statistics that help with a quick assessment of the data quality and detection of potential issues.