We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
使用openwrt.ai提供的king3399的默认docker固件, 与j4105+pve下虚拟机开的openwrt虚拟机对比, luci界面渲染慢了很多。
同样点击openclash的"覆写界面" 设置栏,king3399 docker版固件要花1-2秒响应时间,而j4105 pve下开出的虚拟机几乎秒出。 使用htop观察占用率,发现king3399 docker版openwrt下有一个"ucode /www/cgi-bin/luci"的进程消耗了大量cpu, 而j4105 pve版的就没有。希望修复这个问题,提高arm设备的使用体验。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
编译的时候用uhttpd做web服务器是否对提高性能有帮助?
Sorry, something went wrong.
不会编译,但我用另外一个固件,也是rk3399 + docker 运行openwrt容器,后台显示luci界面是用 “/usr/bin/lua /www/cgi-bin/luci”这个命令渲染的,速度就快了很多。是不是新版luci使用的ucode性能问题?
No branches or pull requests
使用openwrt.ai提供的king3399的默认docker固件, 与j4105+pve下虚拟机开的openwrt虚拟机对比, luci界面渲染慢了很多。
同样点击openclash的"覆写界面" 设置栏,king3399 docker版固件要花1-2秒响应时间,而j4105 pve下开出的虚拟机几乎秒出。
使用htop观察占用率,发现king3399 docker版openwrt下有一个"ucode /www/cgi-bin/luci"的进程消耗了大量cpu, 而j4105 pve版的就没有。希望修复这个问题,提高arm设备的使用体验。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: