Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

we could consider supporting f*::Inf and f*::NaN #3

Open
ModProg opened this issue Apr 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

we could consider supporting f*::Inf and f*::NaN #3

ModProg opened this issue Apr 2, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@ModProg
Copy link
Collaborator

ModProg commented Apr 2, 2023

In the positive case this would be no different from generic support for path::Ident but in the negative case this would require special handling. Feel free to ignore this, just crossed my mind.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ModProg