Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README and Use Key4hep instead of Key4HEP #244

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Update README and Use Key4hep instead of Key4HEP #244

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

jmcarcell
Copy link
Member

BEGINRELEASENOTES

  • Update README: remove note about GaudiAlg being outdated since it's not there anymore and Use Key4hep instead of Key4HEP

ENDRELEASENOTES

README.md Outdated
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ types of algorithms, depending on your use case:
- The `Transformer` is the more general one (both the `Consumer` and the
`Producer` are a particular case of this one) and takes both inputs and
outputs
- The `Filter`, for removing events from the events that are going to be
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- The `Filter`, for removing events from the events that are going to be
- The `FilterPredicate`, for removing events from the events that are going to be

Copy link
Contributor

@m-fila m-fila Oct 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this explanation is a bit misleading since, the even will be marked to be filtered out only in the current branch of the workflow (and whether it's dropped there depends on the properties of the Sequencer/DecisionHub to which it belongs)

How about something like this:
for determining/controlling whether subsequent algorithms in the sequence are executed or bypassed

@jmcarcell jmcarcell merged commit 117bbce into main Oct 9, 2024
6 of 9 checks passed
@jmcarcell jmcarcell deleted the readme branch October 9, 2024 06:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants