Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Nostr_Clients_Recommendations.md #143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

0xdevcollins
Copy link
Contributor

Added a detailed comparison table of the top Nostr clients for mobile, web, and desktop platforms. The analysis covers ease of installation, stability, data integrity, and user-friendliness. This research was done in collaboration with @od-hunter, providing clear recommendations for development and everyday use.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 1, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
joyboy ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 1, 2024 3:13pm
joyboy-webapp ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 1, 2024 3:13pm

Copy link
Collaborator

@maciejka maciejka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR. I would like to understand the methodology behind the results before accepting it. By 'methodology,' I refer to what makes you think it is 'easy to use,' 'stable,' and 'provides data integrity,' etc. I assume you actually installed each of the clients and performed specific actions to arrive at these conclusions. What was your process? What exactly did you do to recommend a client?

@0xdevcollins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Each client was installed on each of devices (mobile, web, and desktop) following their respective installation procedures.
We downloaded it from there respective source and tried setting them up

Ease of Installation: We assessed this based on the clarity of installation instructions, the number of steps required.

Stability: Stability was determined by using the clients over an extended period, noting any crashes, freezes, or bugs. I I also checked user feedback and issue reports from sources like GitHub.

User-friendliness: We checked the interface design, ease of navigation, and overall user experience.

For the testing we installed each client, set up accounts to check how easy it was to get started and adjust settings.
We tested core functions by posting messages, following users, and interacting with content to ensure the basic features worked smoothly.

@maciejka maciejka marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2024 10:56
@maciejka maciejka merged commit 6546eb0 into keep-starknet-strange:main Jun 4, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants