Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider merge #23

Open
kdavies4 opened this issue Aug 19, 2014 · 3 comments
Open

Consider merge #23

kdavies4 opened this issue Aug 19, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@kdavies4
Copy link
Owner

Consider merging this project with those listed in the "see also" section of the README.
- Support FMI (see PyFMI and pySimulator).
- Improve the GUI (pySimulator).
- Model testing (BuildingsPy).

@kdavies4
Copy link
Owner Author

Will use PyFMI in the modelicares.exps.simulators.fmi context manager. PyFMI and ModelicaRes are complimentary, and there is no need to merge the projects. However, may wish to base PyFMI's results class (ResultBase or JMResultBase) on SimRes to add ModelicaRes features to it.

@kdavies4
Copy link
Owner Author

The Annex 60 version of BuildingsPy uses ModelicaRes for results analysis and plotting. ModelicaRes uses a different approach (context managers) to set up and run simulations, so there is currently little synergy for that part. Still need to consider the overlap in the area of model testing.

@kdavies4
Copy link
Owner Author

PySimulator uses the GNU Lesser General Public License (more conservative), which makes it difficult to share code. ModelicaRes will focus on the API rather than the GUI like PySimulator.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant