Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark the s390x CI as non-required #470

Open
fidencio opened this issue May 4, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Mark the s390x CI as non-required #470

fidencio opened this issue May 4, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Improvement to an existing feature needs-review Needs to be assessed by the team.

Comments

@fidencio
Copy link
Member

fidencio commented May 4, 2022

Currently the s390x CI has been re-enabled but it's still not 100% stable.
Let's mark this as non-required till @BbolroC sorts out the situation.

@fidencio fidencio added enhancement Improvement to an existing feature needs-review Needs to be assessed by the team. labels May 4, 2022
@BbolroC
Copy link
Member

BbolroC commented May 4, 2022

Thanks for creating this issue @fidencio

@BbolroC
Copy link
Member

BbolroC commented May 6, 2022

It turns out that the failure is resolved if the backport kata-containers/tests#4633 is merged (onto kata-containers:stable-2.4).

@BbolroC
Copy link
Member

BbolroC commented May 13, 2022

This will be valid until the jenkins slave is migrated to IBM cloud.

@BbolroC
Copy link
Member

BbolroC commented Jul 21, 2022

The intergaration with IBM cloud has been finished. It has been showing that the CI jos for s390x gets stable since then. Even the running time becomes faster from 1h15m to 40m after kata-containers/tests#4919 and kata-containers/tests#4926 (see the results: http://jenkins.katacontainers.io/label/s390x-ubuntu-2004/). @fidencio could you include the jobs again as required and close this issue?

@BbolroC
Copy link
Member

BbolroC commented Jul 21, 2022

I have updated the relevant CI jobs for s390x at http://jenkins.katacontainers.io/view/PR%20Triggered/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement to an existing feature needs-review Needs to be assessed by the team.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants