Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

K8SSAND-1891 ⁃ Update to operator-sdk 1.25.1 #448

Closed
burmanm opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #452
Closed

K8SSAND-1891 ⁃ Update to operator-sdk 1.25.1 #448

burmanm opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #452
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request review Issues in the state 'review'

Comments

@burmanm
Copy link
Contributor

burmanm commented Nov 14, 2022

What is missing?
Update to operator-sdk 1.25.1, go 1.19 and Kubernetes 1.25

Why do we need it?

Environment

  • Cass Operator version:

    Insert image tag or Git SHA here

Anything else we need to know?:

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito
┆Issue Number: K8SSAND-1891
┆Priority: Medium

@burmanm burmanm added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 14, 2022
@burmanm burmanm self-assigned this Nov 14, 2022
@sync-by-unito sync-by-unito bot changed the title Update to operator-sdk 1.25.1 K8SSAND-1891 ⁃ Update to operator-sdk 1.25.1 Nov 14, 2022
@burmanm burmanm moved this to Ready For Review in K8ssandra Nov 17, 2022
@adejanovski adejanovski added the ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' label Nov 17, 2022
@adejanovski adejanovski moved this from Ready For Review to Review in K8ssandra Nov 18, 2022
@adejanovski adejanovski added review Issues in the state 'review' and removed ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' labels Nov 18, 2022
Repository owner moved this from Review to Done in K8ssandra Nov 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request review Issues in the state 'review'
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants