Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

K8SSAND-1645 ⁃ If no finalizer is present, skip deletion process #366

Closed
burmanm opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #367
Closed

K8SSAND-1645 ⁃ If no finalizer is present, skip deletion process #366

burmanm opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #367
Labels

Comments

@burmanm
Copy link
Contributor

burmanm commented Jul 12, 2022

What happened?
If there's no finalizer present, we shouldn't do our finalizer processing. This means deletion of PVCs, blocking deletion and possibly decommission a datacenter (among other things).

However, we add finalizer in our process if it is removed. As such, we need an annotation that prevents the re-adding of that annotation (or even adding it at all).

Did you expect to see something different?

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):

Environment

  • Cass Operator version:

    Insert image tag or Git SHA here

    * Kubernetes version information:

    kubectl version

    * Kubernetes cluster kind:
insert how you created your cluster: kops, bootkube, etc.
  • Manifests:
insert manifests relevant to the issue
  • Cass Operator Logs:
insert Cass Operator logs relevant to the issue here

Anything else we need to know?:

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito
┆friendlyId: K8SSAND-1645
┆priority: Medium

@burmanm burmanm added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 12, 2022
@sync-by-unito sync-by-unito bot changed the title If no finalizer is present, skip deletion process K8SSAND-1645 ⁃ If no finalizer is present, skip deletion process Jul 12, 2022
@burmanm burmanm mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2022
5 tasks
@burmanm
Copy link
Contributor Author

burmanm commented Jul 12, 2022

k8ssandra/k8ssandra-operator#615

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants