-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluation of Pose #10
Comments
Hi, The default choice is the right one, since I have configured the flags in the kitti.yml. It filters the flow matches via SIFT Loc, and computes the pose using the filtered matches. The default one should have been '5-point' + ' Flow matches '+ 'SIFT Loc'. I notice that some people report their RANSAC CUDA extension does not work well, which might be the reason for the wrong performance. Would you mind sharing your results (relative poses predicted by the network) of sequence 09? I may have a look at the results. Best, |
Hi! Thanks! Happy the Spring Festival ! Sorry for late reply. Following steps in issue #8 , I got the evaluation results. The translational error is 4.029%, the rotational error is 1.317 deg/100m, and ATE is as large as 61.888m. Best |
Happy the Spring Festival. I would have a look after coming back to the work. I guess I should clean the pose evaluation code and release it later. |
Hello,
I want to reproduce the results of pose evaluation with your method. During this process, I was confused by some problems as blow:
Following issue About KITTI Pose #8 , I predicted rel_pose with your model first, transformed them into abs_pose using VO evaluation code provided in your answer, and evaluated them with KITTI odometry evaluation toolbox mentioned in README.md.. But the result is also not so good, closing to results in the issue. I found in the code, that the pose is calculated by RANSAC with default choice, which means just using flow matches to get the pose(is that right?). Is it because the default choice that caused the result not good, or the default choice is enough to get the best result? I was wondering how to set the config to get the best result as in Table 3 of your paper.
As in Table 5, there are many choice to calculate pose. But I don't know how to use them in your code . There are so many flags in config.py, and some of them are dummy. Which flags should I set 'True' to use,for example, the method with best performence in Table 5 as '5-point' + ' Flow matches '+ 'SIFT Loc'?
@jytime can you help me with them? Thank you very much!
Best
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: