-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 377
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RBS signatures #455
Comments
Could you describe the issue a little bit more. What are these "RBS" signatures? |
This looks interesting. Maybe in the future. I am putting this on my watch list of the new things to learn. |
Nice. The intent of the question was to know whether you'd be interested in me contributing the sigs and perhaps dialing it in CI. |
Ah, lol. I thought it was a cryptographic signature algorithm I've never heard of. Now it makes sense :) |
I think that it could bring value to describe the public methods of the gem like this. The challenge maybe is to figure out what the signature actually is :). There is a lot of history. Would appreciate a little something related to this. Maybe starting with the Have not bumped into this for any gems I'm familiar with. Are there some examples out there how existing gems have adapted/implemented something like this? |
I added RBS for jwt to gem_rbs_collection. Currently, this doesn't cover all signature and some parts are untyped. |
Think i'm going to close this one. Lets keep the RBS signatures separated. |
I've noticed that
jwt
doesn't ship with rbs signatures yet. Is this something the project would like to have going forward?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: