You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have mentioned this before in a slightly different way, before you added the web site graphs.
Would it be possible to add the Base Station and Aid to Navigation total
to the distance chart as a separate line with scale on RHS
My normal total Base plus AtoN is about 6-8, currently it is 12 and there is or recently has been a little more enhanced propagation as shown by the distance chart on the Station Details web page (above).
At this level (4 above average) I often see about 100 NM (as far as Calais):
In my post in discussions last October, there is a screen grab with 566NM distance and 29 base and AtoN stations in total (reproduced below).
I think there is a good correlation between Base and AtoN total and enhanced propagation at the receiving location.
Adding this to the distance graph will enable us to record to help test this and it may be useful as an alarm trigger when above a certain number.
When I mentioned this before, I suggested turning the box on top RHS of the screen a different colour using a value based on the user's Base and AtoN count, above the local 'average'. This could be automated based on a long term average (say 1, maybe 3 months) and a number above this as the alarm trigger. That way each user can set the enhanced propagation alarm to suit their location.
Change colour of above from white to a user selectable colour, perhaps.
The total count to act as a trigger could be added as a parameter, but may be better if it could be stored as a local average (as recorded over a month or so). To test this and use it as an alarm trigger it could just be a parameter used at run-time, likewise, initially the average could also be added as a parameter: 'new parameter' 8 13 where 8 is local average and 13 is the alarm trigger.
What do you think?
Happy to discuss further and test it if needed
Regards
Roger
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is a bit of work even to add something simple to make it backward compatible with the history backup so will add something but will take a bit of time.
Jasper,
I have mentioned this before in a slightly different way, before you added the web site graphs.
Would it be possible to add the Base Station and Aid to Navigation total
to the distance chart as a separate line with scale on RHS
My normal total Base plus AtoN is about 6-8, currently it is 12 and there is or recently has been a little more enhanced propagation as shown by the distance chart on the Station Details web page (above).
At this level (4 above average) I often see about 100 NM (as far as Calais):
In my post in discussions last October, there is a screen grab with 566NM distance and 29 base and AtoN stations in total (reproduced below).
I think there is a good correlation between Base and AtoN total and enhanced propagation at the receiving location.
Adding this to the distance graph will enable us to record to help test this and it may be useful as an alarm trigger when above a certain number.
When I mentioned this before, I suggested turning the box on top RHS of the screen a different colour using a value based on the user's Base and AtoN count, above the local 'average'. This could be automated based on a long term average (say 1, maybe 3 months) and a number above this as the alarm trigger. That way each user can set the enhanced propagation alarm to suit their location.
Change colour of above from white to a user selectable colour, perhaps.
The total count to act as a trigger could be added as a parameter, but may be better if it could be stored as a local average (as recorded over a month or so). To test this and use it as an alarm trigger it could just be a parameter used at run-time, likewise, initially the average could also be added as a parameter: 'new parameter' 8 13 where 8 is local average and 13 is the alarm trigger.
What do you think?
Happy to discuss further and test it if needed
Regards
Roger
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: