Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump empack #96

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024
Merged

Bump empack #96

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

martinRenou
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@nthiery
Copy link

nthiery commented Jun 17, 2024

Nice to see progress :-) Would it help if I tried the branch now, or is it to hot from the oven at this stage?

@martinRenou
Copy link
Member Author

I guess you can test out empack 4.0.0 already (only installable from PyPi right now) and not respecting the jupyterlite-xeus dependency requirement.

@martinRenou martinRenou reopened this Jun 17, 2024
@martinRenou martinRenou marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2024 13:20
@martinRenou martinRenou merged commit 6fa187f into jupyterlite:main Jun 17, 2024
21 of 22 checks passed
@martinRenou martinRenou deleted the update_empack_pin branch June 17, 2024 13:22
@martinRenou
Copy link
Member Author

martinRenou commented Jun 17, 2024

meeseeksdev please backport to 0.1.x again

Copy link

lumberbot-app bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Something went wrong ... Please have a look at my logs.

It seems that the branch you are trying to backport to does not exist.

@martinRenou
Copy link
Member Author

meeseeksdev please backport to 0.1.x

Copy link

lumberbot-app bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Something went wrong ... Please have a look at my logs.

martinRenou added a commit to martinRenou/jupyterlite-xeus that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
* Bump empack

* Get rid of cache ?

* Even less caching but I'm not sure
martinRenou added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
* Bump empack

* Get rid of cache ?

* Even less caching but I'm not sure
martinRenou added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
* Bump empack

* Get rid of cache ?

* Even less caching but I'm not sure
@nthiery
Copy link

nthiery commented Aug 3, 2024

I forgot to provide feedback: this worked smoothly on my use case!
Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants