Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to verify model #1486

Open
wuboya0003 opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

How to verify model #1486

wuboya0003 opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@wuboya0003
Copy link

I am wondering how could I get a more comprehensive evaluation of this model, should I make a five-fold cross validation or multiple repeated experiments, for example run 3 or 4 times CycleGAN.
thanks for your answer.

@taesungp
Copy link
Collaborator

One challenge about evaluating CycleGAN (or image manipulation model in general) is that there is no absolute automated metric that we can rely on. There is FID that measures realism, but it has its own problems like validity of the metric, sensitivity toward the number of samples, and most importantly not measuring its alignment with the inputs. Therefore, it'd be difficult to do tricks like five-fold cross validation. Nevertheless, one reasonable thing to do would be doing multiple repeated experiments and measuring FIDs.

@wuboya0003
Copy link
Author

Your answer helped me a lot. Now I am investigating on medical image denoising and SSIM and PSNR are usually utilized to evaluate the performance of model, if I want to evaluate the performance of my model(based on CycleGAN), does it mean that I have to do multiple repeated experiments with different train and test set.

@wuboya0003
Copy link
Author

And if multiple repeated experiments are necessary, how many times should I do this experiment?

@junyanz
Copy link
Owner

junyanz commented Oct 4, 2022

some people did 5 runs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants