Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open Community Working Meeting 2022-11-21 - 14:00 PT #270

Open
1 of 4 tasks
Relequestual opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks

Open Community Working Meeting 2022-11-21 - 14:00 PT #270

Relequestual opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
Working Meeting Identify working meetings

Comments

@Relequestual
Copy link
Member

Relequestual commented Nov 17, 2022

📺 See Recording

Go To Previous Meeting

Agenda

Topic Owner Decision/NextSteps
Review last call's action items @Relequestual All action items were reviewed.
Twitter 😬 - Do we host our own Mastodon server? (Primarily for JSON Schema)
There are some domain names we could use and a managed service we could use. Cost is small. Others can follow from other servers. I'm mostly thinking about for the primary JSON Schema account, not for just anyone to sign up. Or, we could just register on the main mastodon.social server. Thoughts?
@Relequestual No particular action is favoured.
Export JSON Schema account data.
JSON Schema Extensions discussion #257 @awwright Feedback requested on discussion #257.
Also, Break down the suggestions into individual proposals and changes if need be, are to be done incrementally to spec after feedback.
Proposal: Disallow non-vocabulary keywords discussion #241 @handrews Rolled over to next meeting.
Flag usage in SDLC PR #1348 @gregsdennis Adding flags to structured data and dealing with them presentationally is suggested.

Highlights

  • All action items from the last call were reviewed.
  • In light of current happenings at Twitter, discussion over usage of Mastodon server, to create or to join one.
  • Updates shared by @awwright regarding JSON Schema Extensions. Feedback requested @ discussion #257.
  • Discussion on flag usage to differentiate between stable and unstable features, and where to make the changes. Follow the discussion @ PR #1348

Actions

  • Break down the document into individual proposals, from the discussion #257 and request for comments.
  • Create an issue in referencing repo to capture the discussion on media-type from prev meeting
  • Export account data of JSON Schema, in context of discussion on Twitter and Mastodon
  • Request for more feedback on relevant issues.

Attendees

Account
@Relequestual
@jdesrosiers
@Julian
@gregsdennis
@jonaslagoni
@awwright

Details

Twitter-Mastodon

  • Join an existing server ? or Set up our own ?
  • Concern with joining an existing server, might get overloaded leading to loss of postings.
  • Cross-posting setup is required.

No particular action is favoured for now.


Discussion on usage of flags

  • Usage of flags for all and no flags for stable i.e all unflagged are stable.
  • Use of yearly flag was discussed.
  • Can the above changes be encoded in structured data itself ?
  • Adding flags to all, allowing to hide or show flags, or how they are rendered once spec is converted from xml to its new avatar i.e dealing with them on presentation end.
  • How to identify discrete features and flag them ? Tricky, in cases where there is interaction between different features.
@Relequestual Relequestual added the Working Meeting Identify working meetings label Nov 17, 2022
@Relequestual Relequestual pinned this issue Nov 18, 2022
@jdesrosiers
Copy link
Member

Please review the new SLDC PR json-schema-org/json-schema-spec#1348 if you haven't yet. This meeting will be a good time to discuss any issues.

@handrews
Copy link

handrews commented Nov 21, 2022

I probably can't make the meeting today so here are my thoughts on Mastodon:

We definitely should not use mastadon.social, as it's got scaling issues and also possibly content moderation issues that we don't want to get caught up in. We're a technical project and don't want to get caught up in battles over what "free speech" levels are appropriate.

fosstodon.org looks like an instance that would be suitable: It is focused on open source, and its code of conduct and other rules are designed to facilitate those conversations rather than political brawls.

I don't personally see an upside in running our own instance (and I would not migrate my account to it even if we had one). That just creates our own little silo that people then have to make a bit more effort to connect with. We want to encourage more relationships between our project and relevant people, and a instance like fosstodon would facilitate that. We already have a dedicated community space with slack.

@Relequestual
Copy link
Member Author

I don't personally see an upside in running our own instance (and I would not migrate my account to it even if we had one).

If we had our own instance, I wouldn't intend to open it up to others to register. Just as a single user instance. Otherwise costs and management effort could be high.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Working Meeting Identify working meetings
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants