You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A good question @ns-rse! There is actually a page in the docs asking to cite the original paper that skan was written for. However, that is of course unfair to the contributors that have come since. This is something I have thought about a lot (similarly for scikit-image, for example). With skan, my plan (with no timeline) was to finish a bunch of API tweaks, like the round-tripping to networkx that we're working on, then publish a JOSS paper that includes all the contributors thus far. Depending on how long we think that would take, we can either make a Zenodo archive in the meantime, or just push through for JOSS.
I was curious if there is a method of citing Skan?
Some thoughts on things that can be done to make it easier to cite Skan are...
Making it easier to cite the software would help in quantifying how widely used it is (in the research community at least!).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: