You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This evalute.py actually take the input image and then simply down sample the image first and then apply bicubic and then apply dcscn which almost similar to the input image. I don't want to down sample the image so for example if you give 2 x 2 resolution image as test image it would return 4 x 4.
Please reply thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks its worked.
If we have multiple options from High resolution to low resolution for same dataset, What you suggest on which resolution should we train so system can generate better results on all resolution
It's totally up to what scale you want. Please note if you trained the model with x3, the model only work for x3 super resolution. There is a technic to share x2 - x4 model for the first part and it worth try.
However, so far, my model only works for one specific scale. Thx!
This evalute.py actually take the input image and then simply down sample the image first and then apply bicubic and then apply dcscn which almost similar to the input image. I don't want to down sample the image so for example if you give 2 x 2 resolution image as test image it would return 4 x 4.
Please reply thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: