You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My understanding is that: Convolution is the process by which the out_channel becomes smaller, and deconvolution is the process by which the out_channel becomes larger.
Why is it the opposite in the code?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Deconvolution is the process of upsampling the input data into a certain shape. Since the function is transposed convolution 1D, the sequence length would be multipled by a factor of stride.
The Mel is a representation that is much more condensed compared to the original wav. However number of channels is bigger (e.g., 80, 128). Thus You need to make the channels concluded into 1 (Which is, Amplitude in the waveform) and then upsample it to a longer degree.
(conv_pre): Conv1d(80, 512, kernel_size=(7,), stride=(1,), padding=(3,))
(0): ConvTranspose1d(512, 256, kernel_size=(16,), stride=(8,), padding=(4,))
(1): ConvTranspose1d(256, 128, kernel_size=(16,), stride=(8,), padding=(4,))
(2): ConvTranspose1d(128, 64, kernel_size=(4,), stride=(2,), padding=(1,))
(3): ConvTranspose1d(64, 32, kernel_size=(4,), stride=(2,), padding=(1,))
My understanding is that: Convolution is the process by which the out_channel becomes smaller, and deconvolution is the process by which the out_channel becomes larger.
Why is it the opposite in the code?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: