Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance without histology better than with histology #80

Open
ethanweinberger opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Performance without histology better than with histology #80

ethanweinberger opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ethanweinberger
Copy link

Hi Jian,

First of all, thanks for the awesome tool! I (along with @symoon) been investigating using SpaGCN for one of our projects. We're successfully able to reproduce the results from the tutorial notebook, though we've noticed some surprising behavior regarding inclusion of the histology information. In particular, when we train without incorporating histology, we see better agreement with the ground truth spatial domains than training with histology included. We've created a colab notebook to reproduce this phenomenon here.

Have you noticed similar phenomena before? We were surprised to see this, as we assumed performance with histology would be better than without, but we didn't see any discussion of this in the original paper.

Thanks!

@EasonBz
Copy link

EasonBz commented Sep 24, 2023

Have you tried more data now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants