You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seems to be some mismatching going on inside the viz command. The DuctTape help message says that unpacked is the default style -- I would assume that's the most detailed output. However, in reality it seems like a very small graph is created by default, and that a much larger graph is created by --viz-type packed than by --vis-type unpacked. Perhaps the code hooked into these two flags is reversed?
Details from actual commands below:
Packed:
$ ducttape full_system.tape -C mysystem.tconf -p large --viz-type packed viz | wc -l
ducttape 0.3
by Jonathan Clark
Reading workflow configuration: mysystem.tconf
Generating GraphViz dot visualization of packed workflow...
42096
Unpacked:
$ ducttape full_system.tape -C mysystem.tconf -p large --viz-type unpacked viz | wc -l
ducttape 0.3
by Jonathan Clark
Reading workflow configuration: mysystem.tconf
Finding hyperpaths contained in plan...
Found 59 vertices implied by realization plan large
Union of all planned vertices has size 59
Generating GraphViz dot visualization of unpacked workflow...
186
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There seems to be some mismatching going on inside the
viz
command. The DuctTape help message says thatunpacked
is the default style -- I would assume that's the most detailed output. However, in reality it seems like a very small graph is created by default, and that a much larger graph is created by--viz-type packed
than by--vis-type unpacked
. Perhaps the code hooked into these two flags is reversed?Details from actual commands below:
Packed:
Unpacked:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: