[Bug]: Jest does not correctly resolve wildcards in subpath imports

[JavaScriptBach]

Version

29.7.0

Steps to reproduce

See https://github.com/JavaScriptBach/jest-repro

Expected behavior

When a subpath import with a wildcard is defined, Jest does not correctly resolve it.

For example, if I define

"imports": {
    "#test/*.css": "./src/*.css",
    "#test/*.ts": "./src/*.ts"
},

Then an import of #test/asdf/css.ts should resolve to ./src/asdf/css.ts.

Actual behavior

Instead, Jest resolves it to ./src/asdf.css.

Additional context

My envinfo below is macOS, but this issue also happens on Linux.

Environment

System:
    OS: macOS 14.6
    CPU: (10) arm64 Apple M1 Pro
  Binaries:
    Node: 18.14.0 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v18.14.0/bin/node
    Yarn: 1.22.19 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v18.14.0/bin/yarn
    npm: 9.3.1 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v18.14.0/bin/npm
    pnpm: 9.7.0 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v18.14.0/bin/pnpm

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 30 days.

[JavaScriptBach]

Bump

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 30 days.

[SimenB]

This is a bug in resolve.exports, which is what we use to map the imports and exports patterns.

const { imports } = require('resolve.exports');

const resolved = imports({
  'imports': {
    '#test/*.css': './src/*.css',
    '#test/*.ts': './src/*.ts',
  },
}, '#test/asdf/css.ts');

console.log(resolved);

Logs out [ './src/asdf.css' ].

Mind opening up an issue there? If I delete the *.css pattern it works correctly.

[JavaScriptBach]

Shouldn't the fix be to use require.resolve or import.meta.resolve instead? This way it is using Node.js's module resolution instead of a third-party library's.

[SimenB]

No, we cannot configure that to work with e.g. browser resolution or moduleMapper or mocks or anything. So we need a custom implementation.

I've tried many times to get node to expose their resolution algorithm, but they're not particularly interested in it