You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Mozilla Firefox, Filezilla, some Linux distributions e.a. only publish SHA512 hashes for their packages/ISO's nowadays.
By performing a search of this project for SHA512, some hits come up that are incomprehensible to me -- from what I can understand they are just testing code.
Kindly consider creating a sha512deep.
P.S.
After sorting the issues by most positive (+1) reactions I found issue #339 (2015/07) which requests the same; naturally, I performed the same search as I mention above once more and only then noticed the upper left of the search hits page, i.e. that I can view hits in code or in issues, but separately… As is obvious, I was viewing hits in code, but not in issues. By switching to issues, I also found issue #253 (2012/12), also requesting the same.
I apologize for requesting what has already been requested twice… nonetheless, the time might be right!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Mozilla Firefox, Filezilla, some Linux distributions e.a. only publish SHA512 hashes for their packages/ISO's nowadays.
By performing a search of this project for SHA512, some hits come up that are incomprehensible to me -- from what I can understand they are just testing code.
Kindly consider creating a sha512deep.
P.S.
After sorting the issues by most positive (+1) reactions I found issue #339 (2015/07) which requests the same; naturally, I performed the same search as I mention above once more and only then noticed the upper left of the search hits page, i.e. that I can view hits in code or in issues, but separately… As is obvious, I was viewing hits in code, but not in issues. By switching to issues, I also found issue #253 (2012/12), also requesting the same.
I apologize for requesting what has already been requested twice… nonetheless, the time might be right!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: