Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More advanced DFS compatibility checks #253

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

More advanced DFS compatibility checks #253

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jborean93
Copy link
Owner

Avoid setting the SMB2_FLAGS_DFS_OPERATIONS flag in the SMB header if the server did not report it as supporting DFS operations during the negotiation phase. This should hopefully fix up some problems when the server errors in the case it doesn't support DFS operations.

Fixes: #242

Avoid setting the SMB2_FLAGS_DFS_OPERATIONS flag in the SMB header if
the server did not report it as supporting DFS operations during the
negotiation phase. This should hopefully fix up some problems when the
server errors in the case it doesn't support DFS operations.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (37512ee) 99.06% compared to head (0607a20) 99.06%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #253   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.06%   99.06%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        5112     5112           
=======================================
  Hits         5064     5064           
  Misses         48       48           
Flag Coverage Δ
99.06% <100.00%> (ø)
py3.10 99.02% <100.00%> (ø)
py3.11 99.02% <100.00%> (ø)
py3.12 99.02% <100.00%> (ø)
py3.7 99.01% <100.00%> (ø)
py3.8 99.02% <100.00%> (ø)
py3.9 99.05% <100.00%> (ø)
x64 99.06% <100.00%> (ø)
x86 98.98% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jborean93
Copy link
Owner Author

This didn't help

@jborean93 jborean93 closed this Jan 2, 2024
@jborean93 jborean93 deleted the dfs branch January 2, 2024 04:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unknown NtStatus error returned 'STATUS_FS_DRIVER_REQUIRED'
1 participant