-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
Roadmap
Ideas thrown in the wild. Not necessarily in order.
Obvious.
Right now, ValueHolder
needs to be implemented for each value you wish to wrap for processing. Implement a generic way to provide the user with the ability to wrap the types for them.
A sample implementation already exists in json-schema-processor-examples
Can have its uses. Interface still to be defined however (we don't want to have a ValueHolder
of a ValueHolder
).
Some of these may, or may not, make it in 1.2.x.
Not easy to think of "useful" examples for such a generic library...
Right now, this is done by hand. Scenario:
- processor
p1
has outputO1
; - processor
p2
has outputO2
; - processor
p
has an input consisting of a combination ofO1
andO2
.
Find a generic way to allow such combinations. Find a generic way to "wait for" p1
and p2
before invoking p
.
.failOnError()
does the job but it is crude. Allow to customize its behaviour somewhat. Message template?