-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
running a single test #34
Comments
Bump, also interested in this. |
I'm convinced now that there is no way of doing this |
No, it has to be implemented as a new feature. :) |
Would it be possible to run a single test file as an alternative...? Edit, there's the |
Bumping, interested in this as well. My use case might not be the most popular but it's a use case nevertheless. I'm making practical exercises for an OCaml course. I want to leave a function to implement and put inline tests near this function to give usage examples immediately. I also want learners to write the implementation and run tests ONLY FOR THIS NEW FUNCTION, so they can have immediate feedback loop. I imagine having the same prefix for the same exercise, so you can easily run all inline tests for a single function with an option like |
Hey!
I'm trying to run a single test via:
but I'm getting
whereas the file indeed exists at my path. I'm a bit confused on how to use that option
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: