-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Status of Jamulus integration in Linux distributions #223
Comments
Not a mainstream distribution, but one focused on music tools, jamulus is actually in its testing phase for LibraZiK. I'm waiting to finish the whole French translation to get it out of the testers repo and in the users repo. |
ArchLinux (and any Arch based distro) has the latest version available in the AUR. |
Just noticed the AUR has its own |
Yep, distros tend to do that from time to time. Sometimes with a very good reason, but usually not. Maybe someone can drop them a message about the existence of a upstream desktop file ? Oh, after checking, I know the packager and will report that to him. |
Hi all, Co-maintainer of AUR Archlinux package here. |
It would be nice if the desktop file was installed by qmake, see #247 (comment), #247 (comment) and #247 (comment). P.S. For cross-distro tracking there is https://repology.org/project/jamulus/versions. |
Can you create a pull request for that? If not you, than anybody else? |
BTW: The link in your post is pretty cool :-) Edit: I have moved the link to the packaging status in the first post of this Issue. |
Unfortuntaely, I will not be able to open a PR anytime soon. |
@jtojnar atsampson was so kind to do the implementation and the new code is already merged to the Git master. Do you have the possibility to check if the implementation works as you requested? |
For NixOs/Nix there's a package on master (but not in any of the stable releases currently) |
|
As said in #439, jamulus 3.5.6 is now officially in the LibraZiK-3 users repo. |
I just found jamulus in homebrew for macOS: https://formulae.brew.sh/cask/jamulus |
Hi everybody, I’m new to Jamulus and I would like to try it on a private Fedora Linux server (version 32). I have been able to create a RPM package, loosely based on the OpenSUSE spec file. I have installed such package and I can run the executable both as a client and a server. So far, so good. However, a problem arises if I try to connect to this server with a client running on the same machine: in other words, I have two instances of the same executable, one started with ‘-s’. When I ask the client to connect to localhost, it crashes immediately with this error: Fatal (internal) error in celt/celt_decoder.c, line 126: assertion failed: st->end <= 21 which seems related to the OPUS library I am using, that is, the one already present on my Fedora installation (version 1.3.1). I have chosen to use the system library instead of the bundled one at compile time. I know nothing about opus library, and very little about Jamulus internals. Any pointer on how to solve this issue? Thanks The following is the spec file I have written, on its way to conform to Fedora guidelines: %define _debugsource_template %{nil} # this to get around a build error Summary: Low-latency internet connection tool for real-time jam sessions BuildRequires: qt5-qtdeclarative-devel %description %prep %build %install %files |
Yes, it's because you're using the system libopus - there's a bug in libopus's custom mode validation that's been fixed in Git but hasn't made it into a release yet. |
Thank you. I have just verified that compiling with the internal opus library actually solves this problem. Aside from this, after some research I have found an unofficial RPM for Fedora made by Yann Collette, which can be found here, version 3.5.5. cheers |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Jamulus 3.6.1 is now officially in the LibraZiK-3 users repo. |
Jamulus 3.6.2 has been in the LibaZiK-3 users repo since mid-December. |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
This issue is basically just a list of URLs which relate to possible integrations of Jamulus in Linux distributions.
Several years ago, there was an attempt to include Jamulus in Redhat:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118963
The CONFIG options "noupcasename" and "opus_shared_lib" were a result of it.
More recently, mirabilos did some work for including Jamulus in Debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958146
We also have Jamulus Issues related to that, e.g., #100
It seems that there is a Jamulus package in OpenSuse available:
https://software.opensuse.org/package/Jamulus
If you know of other Linux distributions or have updated informations, please post them here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: