Should Jami be on 'Applications' list?

[riveravaldez]

Hi, sorry if this is not the place to ask,

trying Jami[1] over an Arch laptop I've found that JACK appears as an optional audio server, but couldn't connect its input/output ports; don't know if this is an issue of Jami (not complete JACK support) or something in my audio settings.

Does anybody know if JACK is fully implemented (and should then be on the list)?

Thanks a lot.

[1] https://jami.net/

[redtide]

I did a quick view on the source code, it seems there is jack support in the daemon, nothing on the qt and gnome clients. Anyway I guess some other user should test it to know.

[riveravaldez]

Thanks a lot, @redtide!

I'm using Jami to work (as a musician) and the JACK support would be an awesome technical improvement (right now I'm solving the situation with the loading of modules with pactl load-module module-jack-sink/source over a running JACK, but this adds some overload to the CPU, and it's less configurable, because you only have a general "pulseaudio" source/sink to connect).

Thanks again, hope I'll have the time to test more. Regards!