Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use SLF4J instead of JUL #19

Closed
mcflythekid opened this issue Apr 12, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #22
Closed

Use SLF4J instead of JUL #19

mcflythekid opened this issue Apr 12, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #22
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
v0.3

Comments

@mcflythekid
Copy link

I see that this lib use java.util.logging.
How can I use log4j2 while running this library?
@mcflythekid
Copy link
Author

mcflythekid commented Apr 12, 2020 •
edited
Loading

As described in this post, why don't we use slf4j to let user choose their logging framework

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11359187/why-not-use-java-util-logging

@fmbenhassine
Copy link
Member

The main motivation was to have zero dependencies. But SLF4J is better. We replaced JUL with SLF4J in other jeasy projects (see j-easy/easy-batch#315 and j-easy/easy-rules#113), so let me plan this for easy-flows as well to be consistent.

If you want to contribute a PR, you are welcome!

@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine added this to the v0.3 milestone Apr 12, 2020
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine changed the title How can I use log4j2 for this library? Use SLF4J instead of JUL Apr 12, 2020
@jaredculp jaredculp mentioned this issue Apr 23, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.3
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Use slfj instead of jul
2 participants
@fmbenhassine @mcflythekid