You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been checking out invidious for a few days now and still am not able to build the lsquic c library for my machine. Google just released a blog post talking about quic/http3 and it states that they saw "YouTube rebuffer time decreased by over 9%." Without knowing exactly what that means, I'm feeling rather unimpressed with the benefits when I have to rebuild and restart my docker container every time I make a change.
Were there any tests done to see the performance difference between using lsquic and regular http requests?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related: #1328
I've been checking out invidious for a few days now and still am not able to build the lsquic c library for my machine. Google just released a blog post talking about quic/http3 and it states that they saw "YouTube rebuffer time decreased by over 9%." Without knowing exactly what that means, I'm feeling rather unimpressed with the benefits when I have to rebuild and restart my docker container every time I make a change.
Were there any tests done to see the performance difference between using lsquic and regular http requests?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: