We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DVC version:
DVC version: 1.0.0a10+4042d5 Python version: 3.7.7 Platform: Darwin-19.4.0-x86_64-i386-64bit Binary: False Package: None Supported remotes: azure, gdrive, gs, hdfs, http, https, s3, ssh, oss Cache: reflink - supported, hardlink - supported, symlink - supported Repo: dvc, git
Reproduce:
clone the https://github.com/shcheklein/example-get-started, run dvc dag
dvc dag
Issue:
We print something like this:
+-------------------+ | data/data.xml.dvc | +------------------+ * * * +---------+ | prepare | +---------+ * * * +-----------+ | featurize | +-----------+ ** ** ** * * ** +-------+ * | train | ** +-------+ * ** ** ** ** * * +----------+ | evaluate | +----------+
It's not clear why we consider data dependency a stage. Why do we consider only DVC-tracked or imported deps as stages, not any other deps?
Suggestion is to avoid showing any dependencies (at least in the default view) and focus on stages only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closing as stale.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
DVC version:
Reproduce:
clone the https://github.com/shcheklein/example-get-started, run
dvc dag
Issue:
We print something like this:
It's not clear why we consider data dependency a stage. Why do we consider only DVC-tracked or imported deps as stages, not any other deps?
Suggestion is to avoid showing any dependencies (at least in the default view) and focus on stages only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: