Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use case: update data registry or combine with model registry #5077

Closed
dberenbaum opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Use case: update data registry or combine with model registry #5077

dberenbaum opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
p1-important Active priorities to deal within next sprints

Comments

@dberenbaum
Copy link
Collaborator

dberenbaum commented Jan 2, 2024

Now that we have a model registry and have even expanded it to work for non-model artifacts, we should revisit the data registry use case. I think this should recommend using Studio to act as the registry across projects rather than have a dedicated data registry repo (see this comment for why I think it's an improvement over the current approach in the use case).

We also should think about how to position this use case. It gets more hits than the model registry, so we should revisit how to explain it alongside the model registry. We may also have some broader data registry use case that involves DVCX and want to redirect there instead. No matter what we decide, we should at least stop recommending the approach of using a centralized Git repo as a data registry.

@dberenbaum dberenbaum added the p1-important Active priorities to deal within next sprints label Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
p1-important Active priorities to deal within next sprints
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant