Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I agree that such an error should not have happened. If you were to share a minimum topology that results in this annoying error message, then I might be able to figure out what was going on, and fix it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
The VXLAN rewrite might have fixed that. Also, we never got the minimum topology, so nothing to work with :( |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
What triggered me to create #405 was an annoying error message when trying to use vxlan.vlans as documented
This happens because those nodes don't have any vlans on them, but the evpn module still expects to use the vlan id
I guess this may be an error in the way vlan ids are generated/assigned, it should be done once globally independent of a vlan being present on a given node
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions