Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move repo to IPLD org #22

Closed
mikeal opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 9 comments
Closed

move repo to IPLD org #22

mikeal opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@mikeal
Copy link

mikeal commented Feb 25, 2020

The spec is being maintained in the IPLD project as well as some other tools and implementations.

@hannahhoward
Copy link
Collaborator

keep in mind links are in use across the filecoin project -- we should probably coordinate this.

@mikeal
Copy link
Author

mikeal commented Feb 26, 2020

GitHub creates forwards for all the links, including the git remote url, so it shouldn’t cause any breaks or disruption.

@Stebalien
Copy link
Contributor

@mikeal it will due to how go modules work. Really, instead of moving, we should probably fork then make this repo a shim that depends on the new one.

@Stebalien
Copy link
Contributor

(or we can move and make sure to handle the fallout)

@mikeal
Copy link
Author

mikeal commented Feb 27, 2020

we should still just move it, dependencies are likely to grow and maintaining it across two repos will only get more difficult in the future. the early we deal with the migration the better.

@Stebalien
Copy link
Contributor

Really, forking and archiving is probably the least problematic approach. Users can upgrade and switch when ready.

@ribasushi
Copy link

@Stebalien has this been decided? Since I will be pushing a PR soon for ipfs/kubo#6870 this is somewhat pressing...

@Stebalien
Copy link
Contributor

Just use this repo for now.

@Stebalien
Copy link
Contributor

Nvm. I've moved this and re-forked it back to the IPFS repo so we don't break upstream.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants