Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Weekly #7: February 16-22 #21

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Weekly #7: February 16-22 #21

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

RichardLitt
Copy link
Member

🌴

@hackergrrl
Copy link
Contributor

Nothing shipped by me last week, but some incremental progress was made:

  • ⭐ Me and @whyrusleeping and @chriscool have been doing lots to make our tests greener. This'll let us get PRs in faster because we won't need to wonder whether our CI is lying to us or not.
  • ⭐ Made progress toward getting go-ipfs compatible with vanilla go get installation. Hope to have more tangible results to show by end of this week.

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

as noffle says, we put a lot of effort into making the CI green. This gives us more confidence about the code we ship, and allows us to ship more often.

@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Member

  • station
    • @dignifiedquire fixed drag and drop
      file uploading, and some dependency issues. So go ahead and try it
      out.
  • ipfs-geoip
    • @dignifiedquire rewrote the generation
      script and cleaned up the code so that now the data is consistently
      reproducable and fully stored on IPFS. This ensures that geoip lookups
      over IFPS will work in all future releases.

@chriscool
Copy link

  • Made 'ipfs files ls' default to '/'.
  • Improved fs-repo-migrations tests by checking that the objects are the same and checking that garbage collection does not change anything.
  • Cleaned up sharness tests.

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member Author

  • http-api-spec: @RichardLitt finished logging all existing ipfs commands for the HTTP API Spec. This means that if you have any questions about how the HTTP API should work, you can see them either in master or as open PRs to that issue. One step closer to a fully functional API...
  • community: @RichardLitt proposed using the new GitHub Templates for IPFS. What do you think about this idea? Chime in here.
  • community: We now have a list of community events for IPFS on the ipfs/community README. Do you have any that you'd like to add? Check out past events, too.

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks. Closing in favor of #17.

jennwrites added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2018
@jennwrites jennwrites deleted the feature/feb-16 branch October 29, 2019 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants