-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IPFS is available hash #3256
Comments
I like this idea. I will suggest users add such a hash before launching the localhost daemon.
This will be required of only the earliest adopters. |
We can add such a small file to the welcome docs (that way they are pre-seeded into every node on init) |
I tired adding it to
|
@lgierth any idea on that error? |
I have a fix for that in #2997 which is blocked |
Specifically ca907c6 brings back the dir-index-html dependency which was deleted for the second time already because it's not |
@lgierth what is it blocked on? |
js-ipfs-api tests making assumption about init-docs: ipfs-inactive/js-ipfs-http-client#365 I figure just picking that commit over here should work. |
#2997 is unblocked and ready |
It is nice feature to check if IPFS is operational only with having access to hashes (
fs:/ipfs/X
), to check if IPFS is supported (for webpages - see ipfs/ipfs-companion#149).Currently my best idea is to use autogenerated
index.html
of empty directory as it is always available hash in IPFS but I think it would be better to have dedicated canary content that would be included in every repo of initial IPFS installation (that would also survive GC).Something like file with content
IPFS is active
for example. Then by requesting this hash usingweb+fs:/ipfs/Qm...AAA
one can check if browser supports IPFS.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: