Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 29, 2020. It is now read-only.

feat: update to new IPLD API #15

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

feat: update to new IPLD API #15

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vmx
Copy link
Contributor

@vmx vmx commented Jan 28, 2019

This is part of the Awesome Endeavour: Async Iterators:
ipfs/js-ipfs#1670

Currently it checks out IPLD directly from a branch. The reason is that I'd like to get approval from all users of the new API first, so that I can still make changes while keeping the history clean.

@achingbrain
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for this, very helpful.

When are you planning on releasing the new IPLD API properly and not via a GH url?

I ask because once it's out I will refactor this module and all the other unix-fs/mfs related ones to remove pull-streams and expose an async API as part of the same Awesome Endeavour.

@vmx
Copy link
Contributor Author

vmx commented Jan 28, 2019

As soon as possible. If I get a thumbsup from you and @alanshaw that the API looks OK, I'll do a release.

@achingbrain
Copy link
Collaborator

It doesn't look like the README in the API changes branch has been updated to document the new API, is the latest source of truth still ipld/js-ipld#185 ?

@vmx
Copy link
Contributor Author

vmx commented Jan 28, 2019

@achingbrain Yes ipld/js-ipld#185 is the source of truth, I also updated it.

@vmx
Copy link
Contributor Author

vmx commented Jan 28, 2019

ipld/js-ipld#190 is the implementation ipld/js-ipld#185 is the API docs update.

@vmx vmx force-pushed the new-ipld-api branch 2 times, most recently from 30fdc0d to 4b209d6 Compare February 7, 2019 23:34
This is part of the Awesome Endeavour: Async Iterators:
ipfs/js-ipfs#1670
@achingbrain
Copy link
Collaborator

Superseded by #21

@achingbrain achingbrain deleted the new-ipld-api branch May 17, 2019 11:45
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants