Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

async-queues: refactoring #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2024

Conversation

brayniac
Copy link
Contributor

@brayniac brayniac commented Mar 5, 2024

Refactors the async-queues workload to split the broadcast and mpmc tests into two binary targets.

This allows better naming for terms that are specific to each type of queue, differing configuration parameters for each, and better clarity when looking at the source code.

Refactors the async-queues workload to split the broadcast and
mpmc tests into two binary targets.

This allows better naming for terms that are specific to each type
of queue, differing configuration parameters for each, and better
clarity when looking at the source code.
@brayniac brayniac requested a review from thinkingfish March 5, 2024 19:29
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@brayniac brayniac merged commit c75defa into iopsystems:main Mar 6, 2024
9 checks passed
@brayniac brayniac deleted the async-queues-refactor branch March 6, 2024 20:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants