Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UVic Zooarchaeology dataset #264

Open
mckenziekatee opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 10 comments
Open

UVic Zooarchaeology dataset #264

mckenziekatee opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
data help questions specific to a dataset workshop Issues created associated with any of the workshops hosted by the SMBD

Comments

@mckenziekatee
Copy link

Contact details

[email protected]

Dataset Title

UVicFish_OBIS

Describe your dataset and any specific challenges or blockers you have or anticipate.

For eventDate, I am using the date of collection or date of death/catch. Is this the proper use of the term?

Info about "raw" Data Files.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11MEmmKlXuunEY7UFR6ae1Qx3-U32QVE2/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105952061706917281795&rtpof=true&sd=true

@mckenziekatee mckenziekatee added the data help questions specific to a dataset label Apr 22, 2024
@laurabrenskelle
Copy link
Contributor

laurabrenskelle commented Apr 22, 2024

Yes, that is the correct usage of eventDate.

For more detailed reporting about fossils, there are geologicalContext terms and the Chronometric Age extension to Darwin Core.

@laurabrenskelle
Copy link
Contributor

Let me know if you need any other help with this! I've worked with publishing zooarchaeological datasets before. :)

@mckenziekatee
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your help. This dataset is a modern skeletal fish collection used for archaeological ID so all event dates are within the past 50years

@MathewBiddle MathewBiddle added the workshop Issues created associated with any of the workshops hosted by the SMBD label Apr 23, 2024
@mckenziekatee
Copy link
Author

My occurrence file is complete, just working on my MoF extension. Emailed Maria to get access to publish. Thanks for all the help!

@sformel-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

@cornthwaitem are you the Maria referenced above? Any movement on this or ways I can support?

@cornthwaitem
Copy link

@sformel-usgs thanks for tagging me. Kathryn did send an email to the OBIS Canada mailbox which I missed - I have now created an account on the IPT as requested. (Normally that would be because I neglected to check that mailbox, but this time it seems to have hidden the message away somewhere!)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Thank you for identifying this dataset for mobilization. The workshop hosts wanted to check in. Is there anything you need help with in order to mobilize this dataset to OBIS? If you would like assistance from an OBIS node you can find node contacts listed here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 5, 2024
@sformel-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

@mckenziekatee were you able to publish this?

@mckenziekatee
Copy link
Author

Hi Stephen, thanks for reaching out! Unfortunately this project is at a standstill due to a gap in funding but is very close to being ready for publication. I will try to finish it off the side of my desk before the new year if time allows. On a separate but related note, I am interested in whether there are any clearer guidelines on incorporating Local Contexts (LC) specifically into GBIF and OBIS datasets? I've read the issue posts (gbif/hosted-portals#272) from 2023 but can't find much else more current. I'm part of the FAIR + CARE Cultural Heritage Network (https://alexandriaarchive.org/fair-care/#:~:text=The%20FAIR%2BCARE%20Cultural%20Heritage%20Network%20established%20by%20this%20project,%2C%20divisional%2C%20and%20geographic%20boundaries.) working group that is seeking solutions to posting Notices and Labels. The larger dataset, which this proposed OBIS dataset is derived from, is published in GBIF (https://www.gbif.org/dataset/5b11525e-c116-48a0-956f-4147ecd97237) using the dynamicProperties field to link the LC project. Has there been any more discussion about developing a dwc field such as culturalRight or something similar?

@laurabrenskelle
Copy link
Contributor

laurabrenskelle commented Nov 1, 2024

Just chiming in here that this (https://www.gbif.org/dataset/30595b72-0016-42cf-a1b5-afa6a2474cba) is what we did to share context information for some zooarchaeological specimens I helped to publish from the Florida Museum of Natural History. We included a link to OpenContext in locationID. We did put some other context information in using dynamicProperties. We used a key value pair JSON format so it could be retrieved from the data easily if there were future improvements for how to share zooarch data in DwC.

For your Local Contexts link, you could look at putting it in rightsHolder or accessRights instead?

Here are some related conversations/presentations I was able to find:
localcontexts/localcontexts-metadata#2 (mentions accessRights)
https://divseekintl.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/C3_Jane-Anderson-Maui-HudsonLocal-Contexts-DivSeek22.pdf (this mentions mapping to rightsHolder but engaging further to make more comprehensive updates to DwC)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data help questions specific to a dataset workshop Issues created associated with any of the workshops hosted by the SMBD
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants