This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 18, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Test for unary_check()
for tan
function breaking on Julia v1.8
#220
Comments
Note the version of Nabla we use in prod is not the master branch which is a bit fragile from the way we did the ChainRules integration, but rather the the - previous minor release. |
Oops! Totally forgot to switch to the latest minor version! I remember there still being some tests failures for Edit: Nvm, updated the issue to reflect usage of |
BaileyBox
changed the title
Tests breaking on Julia v1.8
test for Sep 29, 2022
unary_check()
for tan
function breaking on Julia v1.8
BaileyBox
changed the title
test for
Test for Sep 29, 2022
unary_check()
for tan
function breaking on Julia v1.8unary_check()
for tan
function breaking on Julia v1.8
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
When running the tests for this package under Julia version
1.8
, Nabla version0.12.3
, 3 tests fail.Using the
tan
function when callingunary_check()
breaks on the 5th iteration of the loop here.unary_check()
just calls thecheck_errs()
function here.The error received is as follows:
NOTE: "rando" is the value from the
randx()
function created right before entering thisfor
loop. Sincerng
is always the same, these numbers are consistent.The other 2 errors occur when also running tests in Julia version
1.6
.Here's an examples of the occurring errors:
From the Scalar tests:
From the Functional tests:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: