qat: improve qat_dpdk_app, openssl-qat-engine

[hj-johannes-lee]

1. drop generic from qat_dpdk_app
2. add compress-perf to e2e
3. make openssl-qat-engine use ubuntu 24.04 and drop all custom builds / cherrypicked in pr Fix repo for opencl-icd, workaround build issues and cherry-pick openssl-qat-engine changes #1728
4. drop e2e tests for qat generic

[mythi]

Looks OK but need to get e2e-qat4 green

[hj-johannes-lee]

sorry for not changing to draft before you already made comments.
Thanks for the comments though. I was just commiting the changes to this commit not to lose the work.

[hj-johannes-lee]

I guess because of the last commit of 3 commits cd/validate does not pass.
Please give your opinion about the change of the name of the app crypto-perf that does not make sense to me.

[mythi]

Please give your opinion about the change of the name of the app crypto-perf that does not make sense to me.

You're right that the name is a bit misleading but we cannot rename it for now (getting a better name does not justify the amount of work/changes needed outside of this repository).

[hj-johannes-lee]

Please give your opinion about the change of the name of the app crypto-perf that does not make sense to me.

You're right that the name is a bit misleading but we cannot rename it for now (getting a better name does not justify the amount of work/changes needed outside of this repository).

I understood, and I somewhat guessed it would not be possible to change. Let me drop the last commit then.

[mythi]

@hj-johannes-lee looking good to me, I added some minor comments. I'd prefer to wait with this until #1699 is available so that the DPDK tests can be tested and enabled too

[mythi]

Fixes: #1687

This isn't fixing all of it. I'm noticing I did not have the issue tasks defined very clearly. I think it would make more sense to rework the commits so that you get to run the tests on e2e-qat until #1699 is available. That is, make the kustomization changes but keep .yamls using generic. What do you think?

[hj-johannes-lee]

I am now confused.
Umm, how do you want to keep generic?
As an overlay of each case?

[mythi]

Umm, how do you want to keep generic?

I proposed to make it so that it's possible to keep using e2e-qat (and DPDK tests running) for now but with all the cleanup done. This PR drops generic but it also stops running the tests

[mythi]

I'd still suggest we get the big chunk of changes tested + merged on the old setup. There's a lot of unrelated things blocked by e2e-spr gaps (too old kernel for the compress-perf fix)

[tkatila]

We should update the SPR kernel soon-ish so we can enable compress-perf on it.