Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

babbage spec - two todo items #2619

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 25, 2022
Merged

Conversation

JaredCorduan
Copy link
Contributor

This PR complete two items from the Babbage spec TODO. Each is in a separate commit (and is probably easier to review commit by commit).

  • Single VRF check
  • Address Shelley errata 17.2, namely do not prefilter the reward update by the registered stake credentials.

Copy link
Contributor

@WhatisRT WhatisRT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd add these to the list of changes in the introduction, otherwise LGTM!

@JaredCorduan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd add these to the list of changes in the introduction, otherwise LGTM!

great idea, thanks!

@@ -23,5 +21,8 @@ \section{Introduction}
\item Add inline datums in the UTxO
\item Add reference scripts
\item Add transaction fields for specifying and returning collateral
\item Remove the protocol parameter $\var{d}$ and the overlay schedule
\item Remove the protocol parameters $\var{d}$ and $\var{extraEntropy}$
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@WhatisRT just letting you know I snuck this in as well (mentioning removing the extra entropy).

@JaredCorduan JaredCorduan merged commit cc843b3 into master Jan 25, 2022
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the jc/babbage-spec-single-vrf branch January 25, 2022 21:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants