We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The exec. spec effectively does
floor (activeSlotCoeeff pp * (floor ((d pp) * SlotsPerEpoch))) - 1
instead of the formal spec's
floor (activeSlotCoeeff pp * ((d pp) * SlotsPerEpoch)))
the exec spec considers the two cases
e_l + 1 /= e e_l + 1 == e
and the formal spec uses two different cases althogether
e = e_l + 1 e_l /= e + 1
sd
pd'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I see if eL' + 1 /= e' then pure src else do in the exec spec
if eL' + 1 /= e' then pure src else do
Sorry, something went wrong.
I agree that aggregate+ should be translated more clearly, maybe using Relation could be of help here?
aggregate+
Relation
thanks, fixed that in the above (but the mismatch remains)
uroboros
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
The exec. spec effectively does
instead of the formal spec's
the exec spec considers the two cases
e_l + 1 /= e
e_l + 1 == e
and the formal spec uses two different cases althogether
sd
andpd'
definitions in the formal spec are hard to recognise in the exec specThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: