You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Few Annotation properties are actually converted into OBO format. Maybe this has to do with the fact that they are not _used_ in the same ontology they are declared?
In any case, I vote to drop OBO support from OMO. I cant imagine anyone using it for anything but as an import into another ontology, which is always done through OWL API so always done through OWL..
Dear community, let us know if you have concerns not publishing OMO in OWL. Alternatively, we need someone to investigate why nearly no AP makes it through to OBO during conversion (not even into the owl-axioms: header in case you wondered).
I would suggest we merge this here because the problem was always present.
Context #179.
In any case, I vote to drop OBO support from OMO. I cant imagine anyone using it for anything but as an import into another ontology, which is always done through OWL API so always done through OWL..
Dear community, let us know if you have concerns not publishing OMO in OWL. Alternatively, we need someone to investigate why nearly no AP makes it through to OBO during conversion (not even into the
owl-axioms:
header in case you wondered).I would suggest we merge this here because the problem was always present.
Originally posted by @matentzn in #179 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: