-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Memory leak or poor memory performance. #1228
Comments
Just after restart:
|
@tau0 Can you tell me a little bit more about your setup? (Hardware specifications, read/write load, data size, etc.) |
HW: https://gist.github.com/tau0/0c44330d04400e93a9e4 |
top - 09:42:13 up 130 days, 5:07, 2 users, load average: 4.39, 4.16, 5.04 Architecture: x86_64 Hi @toddboom , I met the similar situation today, one of the Influxdb servers crashed due to OOM. |
Same issue here. I just setup a PoC running on a VM. it was running fine for a few days with 4G of memory and it started to consume all the memory today even after I added additional 4G of RAM. No CQ as well. I'm using collectd input. |
I'm getting this quite often on c3.xlarge instances, particularly when my boss tries to select a week's worth of data at 0.1s intervals. I'm trying to tune down max-open-shards and max-open-files, but I can't find much current documentation on the parameters. The example on the website show max-open-files configured at 40 and that seems unusually restrictive. Currently I have 10 max-open-shards and 1000 max-open-files with nofiles set to 65536, and I haven't crashed yet with these settings, but I'm afraid to let my boss use it again. When it crashed before, max-open-shards was set to 0 (unlimited). |
This is likely fixed in 0.9.0 and we won't be making fix releases for the 0.8 line. Please test against the latest 0.9.0 RC and let us know if there's an issue. |
@pauldix are you sure that memory issues are fixed? without verifying you are marking it closed. I am also having memory issue on influx 0.8.8 dmesg: |
@lokeshverizon There's enough difference between 0.8.8 and 0.9.0 that bugs in one don't offer much insight into the other system. The memory leaks in 0.8.8 will not be fixed. Most likely 0.9.0 has new memory leaks to find, but the behavior that leads to these leaks is not particularly strange or unusual. |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: