-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 634
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preferred / better typescript build system for inferno (parcel, rollup) ? #1517
Comments
Might want to add esbuild to the equation as well :) esbuild and inferno seem to have the same motto :) |
webpack with ts-loader works well for me |
@MrFoxPro Does that do minifying / tree-shaking too? |
webpack is more stable. I've had issues with the typescript plugin for rollup. No experience with parcel. |
Hopefully we can get improved support in ParcelJS v2 soon parcel-bundler/parcel#8651 . I am using it with a custom resolver, but I need a fix of the way they support monorepos with babeljs pipelines. |
@dessalines Not sure if this is still an issue. However, I am using parcel in KaiUIng |
I'm the front end dev for Lemmy, and we're using @deamme 's typescript transformer, along with fuse-box, to do our front end builds.
Unfortunately tho, fuse-box has upgraded to a new version, and it doesn't seem to support inferno (I tried and failed at adapting it).
Although fuse-box v3 is currently working, we do want to stay with something that's going to be supported in the future, and does all the necessary uglifying and stripping that fuse-box does.
Parcel and Rollup.js seem like good possibilities: https://blog.bitsrc.io/choosing-the-right-javascript-bundler-in-2020-f9b1eae0d12b
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: