Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

eslint performance drops ~7x when upgrading from 2.26.0 to 2.27.5 #2705

Closed
LucasLemanowicz opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 8 comments
Closed

Comments

@LucasLemanowicz
Copy link

I was looking at upgrading our eslint-plugin-import package from 2.26.0 to 2.27.5 but when I run eslint after the upgrade, our lint time goes up from ~90 seconds to ~600 seconds.

Relevant sections from our package.json:

{
  "scripts": {
    "lint": "eslint .",
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "next": "^12.3.4",
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    "@graphql-codegen/add": "^4.0.0",
    "@graphql-codegen/cli": "^3.0.0",
    "@graphql-codegen/introspection": "^3.0.0",
    "@graphql-codegen/near-operation-file-preset": "^2.5.0",
    "@graphql-codegen/typescript": "^3.0.0",
    "@graphql-codegen/typescript-operations": "^3.0.0",
    "@graphql-codegen/typescript-urql": "^3.7.3",
    "@graphql-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^3.15.0",
    "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^5.50.0",
    "@typescript-eslint/parser": "^5.50.0",
    "eslint": "^8.33.0",
    "eslint-config-next": "^12.3.4",
    "eslint-config-prettier": "^8.6.0",
    "eslint-plugin-implicit-dependencies": "^1.1.1",
    "eslint-plugin-import": "^2.27.5",
    "eslint-plugin-prettier": "^4.2.1",
    "eslint-plugin-simple-import-sort": "^10.0.0",
    "eslint-plugin-testing-library": "^5.10.0",
    "prettier": "^2.8.3",
    "typescript": "^4.9.5",
  }
}

Here's an excerpt of a run of eslint --debug .

2.26.0:

  eslintrc:ignore-pattern Check {
  filePath: '/Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx',
  dot: false,
  relativePath: 'src/pages/contact-us.tsx',
  result: false
} +8ms
  eslint:file-enumerator Yield: contact-us.tsx +0ms
  eslintrc:cascading-config-array-factory Load config files for /Users/(...)/src/pages. +8ms
  eslintrc:cascading-config-array-factory Cache hit: /Users/(...)/src/pages. +0ms
  eslint:cli-engine Lint /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +8ms
  eslint:linter Linting code for /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx (pass 1) +0ms
  eslint:linter Verify +5ms
  eslint:linter With ConfigArray: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Parsing: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +1ms
  eslint:linter Parsing successful: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +1ms
  eslint:linter Scope analysis: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Scope analysis successful: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Generating fixed text for /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx (pass 1) +58ms
  eslint:source-code-fixer Applying fixes +65ms
  eslint:source-code-fixer shouldFix parameter was false, not attempting fixes +0ms
  eslintrc:ignore-pattern Check {
  filePath: '/Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx',
  dot: false,
  relativePath: 'src/pages/historical-rates.tsx',
  result: false
} +65ms
  eslint:file-enumerator Yield: historical-rates.tsx +65ms
  eslintrc:cascading-config-array-factory Load config files for /Users/(...)/src/pages. +65ms
  eslintrc:cascading-config-array-factory Cache hit: /Users/(...)/src/pages. +0ms
  eslint:cli-engine Lint /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +65ms
  eslint:linter Linting code for /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx (pass 1) +0ms
  eslint:linter Verify +0ms
  eslint:linter With ConfigArray: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Parsing: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Parsing successful: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +2ms
  eslint:linter Scope analysis: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Scope analysis successful: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Generating fixed text for /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx (pass 1) +68ms
  eslint:source-code-fixer Applying fixes +71ms
  eslint:source-code-fixer shouldFix parameter was false, not attempting fixes +0ms

2.27.5:

  eslintrc:ignore-pattern Check {
  filePath: '/Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx',
  dot: false,
  relativePath: 'src/pages/contact-us.tsx',
  result: false
} +32ms
  eslint:file-enumerator Yield: contact-us.tsx +1ms
  eslintrc:cascading-config-array-factory Load config files for /Users/(...)/src/pages. +32ms
  eslintrc:cascading-config-array-factory Cache hit: /Users/(...)/src/pages. +0ms
  eslint:cli-engine Lint /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +32ms
  eslint:linter Linting code for /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx (pass 1) +1ms
  eslint:linter Verify +0ms
  eslint:linter With ConfigArray: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Parsing: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Parsing successful: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +6ms
  eslint:linter Scope analysis: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Scope analysis successful: /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Generating fixed text for /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx (pass 1) +20s
  eslint:source-code-fixer Applying fixes +20s
  eslint:source-code-fixer shouldFix parameter was false, not attempting fixes +0ms
  eslintrc:ignore-pattern Check {
  filePath: '/Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx',
  dot: false,
  relativePath: 'src/pages/historical-rates.tsx',
  result: false
} +20s
  eslint:file-enumerator Yield: historical-rates.tsx +20s
  eslintrc:cascading-config-array-factory Load config files for /Users/(...)/src/pages. +20s
  eslintrc:cascading-config-array-factory Cache hit: /Users/(...)/src/pages. +0ms
  eslint:cli-engine Lint /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +20s
  eslint:linter Linting code for /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx (pass 1) +15ms
  eslint:linter Verify +0ms
  eslint:linter With ConfigArray: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Parsing: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +4ms
  eslint:linter Parsing successful: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +61ms
  eslint:linter Scope analysis: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Scope analysis successful: /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx +0ms
  eslint:linter Generating fixed text for /Users/(...)/src/pages/historical-rates.tsx (pass 1) +3s
  eslint:source-code-fixer Applying fixes +3s
  eslint:source-code-fixer shouldFix parameter was false, not attempting fixes +0ms

Happy to provide additional logs or configs in case it would be helpful in reproing and debugging.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Apr 13, 2023

Hopefully #2755 and #2756 will help, in the next release of eslint-module-utils and eslint-plugin-import.

@LucasLemanowicz
Copy link
Author

Thanks @ljharb - any idea when the next release will be cut?

(btw - looks like while the code changes for #2755 merged in to main, I can't seem to find the corresponding CHANGELOG entry)

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented May 20, 2023

Nope, no idea, but hopefully soon.

#2755 only changed eslint-module-utils, and that's been published.

@LucasLemanowicz
Copy link
Author

I upgraded my NextJS version which also upgraded eslint-plugin-import from 2.26.0 to 2.28.1 and I am seeing approximately 3x increase in linting time on Vercel. Pinning the eslint-plugin-import to 2.26.0 reduced it back down to normal, as seen in the screenshots here:

Screenshot 2023-10-19 at 6 29 49 PM

main branch on 2.26.0 (focus on time since previous line):
Screenshot 2023-10-19 at 6 33 42 PM

next-13.5 branch after package was updated to 2.28.1 (focus on time since previous line):
Screenshot 2023-10-19 at 6 35 24 PM

next-13.5 branch after pinning package back to 2.26.0 (focus on time since previous line):
Screenshot 2023-10-19 at 6 36 39 PM

Any idea what could be going on?

@LucasLemanowicz
Copy link
Author

I tried upgrading to 2.29.0 and still seeing performance issues. It seems like it might be related to a bew dependency on eslint-import-resolver-typescript. Attaching a dump of the logs when running eslint --debug on a single file on 2.26.0 and 2.29.0:

2.26.0.txt
2.29.0.txt

The main time differences are below. This is 2.26.0:

eslint:linter Generating fixed text for /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx (pass 1) +2s
(...)
eslint:file-enumerator Complete iterating files: ["./src/pages/contact-us.tsx"] +7s

and this is 2.29.0:

eslint:linter Generating fixed text for /Users/(...)/src/pages/contact-us.tsx (pass 1) +13s
(...)
eslint:file-enumerator Complete iterating files: ["./src/pages/contact-us.tsx"] +17s

There's a new dependency on eslint-import-resolver-typescript, which might be related to the slowness above, as there seem to be a few issues about performance on that repo's issue tracker: https://github.com/import-js/eslint-import-resolver-typescript/issues?q=is%3Aissue+performance, including one open issue showing that perf has degraded as of 3.1.0: import-js/eslint-import-resolver-typescript#176

@kthksgy
Copy link

kthksgy commented Oct 31, 2023

I have updated from 2.26.0 to 2.28.x and the same problem occurred to me.
Also, I found a new circular import warning which did not occur in 2.26.0.

After I have turned off import/no-cycle rule, my ESLint's performance has been good enough (almost same performance as 2.26.0).
I also discovered that limiting the depth of circular import check leads to improved performance.

/** .eslintrc.cjs */
// All but the most important parts have been omitted.
module.exports = {
  rules: {
    'import/no-cycle': 'off', // Turned off to prevent circular import check.
  }
}

This may not be a solution for those who require import/no-cycle rule, but I hope it can be of some help.

@soryy708
Copy link
Contributor

soryy708 commented Sep 3, 2024

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Sep 3, 2024

Closing; please file a new issue if you're still seeing perf issues in v2.30+.

@ljharb ljharb closed this as completed Sep 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants