-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Macro results vary over multiple executions #174
Comments
This issue has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there: https://forum.image.sc/t/macro-results-vary-when-calling-it-via-pyimagej/57744/5 |
The Troubleshooting doc now mentions this issue as of imagej/pyimagej@e1b2554. But no one has had time to solve it, unfortunately. |
I commented on the forum thread with some insights:
|
@imagejan Would you consider this a bug in ImageJ? I.e. should we move this issue to imagej/ImageJ? |
Yes. I just tested it with plain ImageJ, and observe the same behavior as seen with Fiji. |
@rasband I transferred this issue here from PyImageJ. Based on your forum post I infer this might actually be working as intended, in which case this issue could be closed as not planned. |
The particle analyzer is working as expected. The Count Masks are filled with a grayscale value corresponding to the particle number. To insure the particle numbers start at 1, use the “Clear results” option, as in this example:
|
Repeatedly calling the same macro code from pyimagej leads to different results.
See detailed description: https://forum.image.sc/t/macro-results-vary-when-calling-it-via-pyimagej/57744
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: