-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Java 17: Start using records #2377
Comments
@iluwatar can you assign this issue to me? |
Hey is this issue still in-progress, can I help with it?? |
Assigned to @ayushanand308, but maybe there's a way to split the work? |
I think @ayushanand308 is not quite active right now!! |
Reassigned to @bharathkalyans due to inactivity |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. The issue will be unassigned if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
…he record class
After finding out there is no assignee for this issue, I have refactored the codebase to use the record classes. It would be great if this issue can be re-assigned to me. I have opened a new Pull Request which needs to be reviewed. Following is the link to the PR: |
…use the recor… (#2505) * Issue #2377: The repository code has been refactored to use the record class * Issue #2377: Refactored according to the rules defined for the repo code * Issue #2377: Refactored according to the rules defined for the repo code * Issue #2377: Refactored according to the rules defined for the repo code
Available since Java 16, we can now use the record type for immutable classes. It's well described at https://dzone.com/articles/what-are-java-records
Acceptance criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: